Learning to "Type"

Several years ago a prominent church growth expert from Nashville told me that the Old Testament does not matter anymore to the New Testament Church. What an amazing statement. His low regard for O.T. Scripture is far from an anomaly. It seems that the pragmatic church of relevant application is attracted to the easily apprehended aspects of Scripture more than the demanding "in depth" stuff. Exploring the recesses of shadowy Hebrew texts is untenable compared to the handy "how to" or "do and don't" lists found in the Pauline epistles. If we are looking for "self help" material in the Scriptures, there is good information to be found there. But, the Scriptures contain a depth that few who are content scratching the surface ever find.

I have suggested previously that the commentaries written by the Fathers of the Early Church may serve as a key to correct interpretation of the Scriptures. I further offered that the Tradition of the Church, commended by Paul, is also important in this regard. Allow me to suggest another Early Church method for understanding the sacred texts. St. Augustine claimed that "the New Testament lies hidden in the Old and the Old is fulfilled in the New." In other words, one may best read the Scriptures with both Testaments opened. While on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24), Jesus utilized this very technique in teaching His confused companions. "And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself." As He shared from the Old Testament, they began to understand the New Testament unfolding all around them...and their hearts "burned within them."

Utilizing this method to unlock the riches of God's plan of salvation history reveals many instances of foreshadowing, prefiguring, or "typology". Theologian and educator Scott Hahn describes a type as, "..a real person, place, thing, or event in the Old Testament that foreshadows something greater in the New Testament."

My next few articles will deal with some of the major typologies found in the the Old Testament that find their fulfillment in the New. What typologies have you found in your studies? Do you find this discipline of Scriptural interpretation valuable in your understanding of God's Word? I am looking forward to your input!